Challenges for Reliability Engineers

Reliability engineers are tasked with ensuring that systems and equipment operate safely and efficiently, minimizing failures and unplanned interruptions. This challenge is particularly relevant in industries dealing with toxic or flammable fluids, where using glass level indicators for liquid level monitoring can pose significant risks. These indicators are prone to damage, exposing operators and facilities to fire hazards, contamination, and other catastrophic failures.

To address these challenges, Petrobras Standard N-1882 establishes strict guidelines for safety in hazardous areas, discouraging the use of glass indicators in critical environments. This reinforces the need for more reliable monitoring systems, such as magnetic level indicators.

Magnetic Level Indicators as a Reliability Solution

Key features of a good magnetic level indicator include material durability under climatic conditions like rain and sunlight. The paddles must be made of sturdy material, such as aluminum, rather than plastic, to ensure longevity. Moreover, the paddles should be molded in color and treated against UV rays to prevent fading over time, which is common for equipment exposed to the elements.

Each paddle should have a magnet, ensuring a consistent vertical alignment across the ruler. Additionally, a mechanical stop should limit the paddle’s rotation to a maximum of 180°, thus eliminating the possibility of random rotations, which are common in low-quality magnetic indicators.

The float’s construction is also crucial. A belt of magnets around the float’s interior ensures accurate measurement, regardless of its position within the chamber.

An essential feature is the inclusion of a float diagnostics system, as illustrated below.

Magnetic level indicators, such as the Orion model by Magnetrol, are ideal for reliability engineers aiming to enhance safety and operational efficiency. Unlike glass indicators, magnetic indicators use an external measurement system, where the fluid remains contained in a sealed tube, eliminating direct contact between the liquid and the environment. This technology drastically reduces the risk of leaks and failures in applications involving toxic or flammable liquids.

Additionally, the Orion model is designed to withstand extreme pressure and temperature conditions, making it highly reliable in challenging environments. Its robustness results in fewer corrective maintenance needs and greater asset availability.

Compliance with Standard N-1882

Compliance with Petrobras Standard N-1882 is essential to ensure safety in critical industrial environments. This standard prioritizes operational integrity in fire risk areas and recommends monitoring systems that provide maximum safety. By replacing glass indicators with magnetic indicators, companies ensure compliance with N-1882 guidelines, eliminating the fragility of glass and providing greater system reliability.

Magnetic indicators are recognized as a more robust and reliable solution, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing safety in processes involving hazardous liquids.

Specific Benefits for Reliability

Magnetic indicators not only ensure greater safety but also significantly reduce unplanned downtime, which is crucial for reliability engineers. By eliminating the use of glass indicators—a common source of failure—companies can drastically reduce corrective interventions, resulting in less downtime and greater process reliability.

The Orion model also offers precise and constant measurements, even in extreme conditions, which is essential for decision-making based on accurate data. Furthermore, the simplified maintenance of these indicators allows for a more proactive approach, with more predictable maintenance cycles and fewer operational interruptions.

According to Petrobras Standard N-1882, magnetic level indicators are preferred in situations where safety and reliability are critical factors, such as operations involving hazardous or corrosive fluids, as well as high-pressure and high-temperature environments. The standard underscores the importance of systems that ensure process integrity, and magnetic indicators stand out by providing safe and continuous operation under adverse conditions.

Conversely, glass level indicators are recommended for simpler applications with lower risk, not involving corrosive liquids or high pressure, making them suitable for low-complexity processes.

Comparative Table: Magnetic Level Indicators vs Glass Level Indicators – Based on Petrobras Standard N-1882

 

CriterionMagnetic Level IndicatorGlass Level Indicator
Principle of OperationMagnetic float activates external indicatorsDirect view through glass tubes or plates
Applications (N-1882)High pressure, high temperature, corrosive or toxic liquidsLow pressure, non-corrosive liquids
SafetyHigh safety level, isolated fluidLower safety, fluid in contact with the indicator
MaintenanceLow maintenance, no breakage riskHigh maintenance due to glass fragility
CostHigherLower
Suitability for Corrosive LiquidsYes, fully suitableNo, glass is prone to corrosion
Temperature and Pressure RangeSuitable for high temperature and pressureLimited to low temperatures and pressures
Direct VisualizationNo, external indicatorYes, direct fluid visualization
Compliance with N-1882Recommended for severe and critical environmentsRecommended for lower-risk applications

Conclusion: The Trusted Choice for Reliability Engineers

For reliability engineers seeking to optimize safety, reduce risks, and increase operational efficiency, magnetic level indicators, such as the Orion model by Magnetrol, are the ideal choice. These indicators fully meet Petrobras Standard N-1882 requirements, offering a robust and reliable solution for critical environments while increasing asset availability and reducing unplanned maintenance needs.

Replacing glass indicators with magnetic indicators is a strategic decision that not only enhances safety but also contributes significantly to long-term reliability and efficiency.